Category: Betting

  • Robinhood Takes Regulators to Court Over Sports Event Contracts in New Jersey and Nevada

    Robinhood Takes Regulators to Court Over Sports Event Contracts in New Jersey and Nevada

    Robinhood has launched lawsuits against gaming regulators in New Jersey and Nevada, arguing that its newly reintroduced sports event contracts are federally compliant and should be allowed to continue without state interference. The move comes as thousands of customers brace for potential disruption.

    Legal Fight Spills Into Federal Court

    Robinhood filed nearly identical suits this week, targeting the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement and the Nevada Gaming Control Board. The cases were lodged in federal court, with the company seeking injunctions to stop both states from taking action while the contracts remain active.

    The timing wasn’t accidental. On the very same day, Robinhood announced the return of its prediction markets, this time linked directly to college and professional football. Within hours, the legal filings were made public.

    For regulators, the issue is simple: sports betting is already heavily controlled at the state level. But Robinhood insists its contracts are commodities futures, overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The difference matters. One puts the contracts under state gambling laws. The other keeps them in federal financial regulation.

    What’s at Stake for Customers

    According to the company, more than 60,000 customers in just two states could see their access disrupted. That’s a sizable figure for a pilot product.

    One person close to the case noted that Robinhood has already invested millions into building out the infrastructure through its CFTC-registered arm, Robinhood Derivatives. Cutting access now, the lawsuits argue, would not just hurt Robinhood but also individual investors who have already placed contracts.

    “This is a decisive step forward in our mission to democratize finance,” a Robinhood spokesperson said. The phrasing may sound familiar—the company has long marketed itself on making trading accessible to everyday investors. But now, the promise is being tested in an area where gambling and finance collide.

    Prediction Markets or Sports Betting?

    The distinction between a sports event contract and a sports bet is not always clear. To some regulators, it looks like a thinly veiled attempt to repackage betting under another name. To Robinhood, however, the products function like any other market-based derivative.

    Contracts are settled based on specific outcomes—for example, whether a football team wins or loses. That resembles betting, but Robinhood frames it as a financial instrument tied to data.

    Here’s a quick snapshot of how these contracts compare with traditional sports betting:

    Feature Sports Betting (State Regulated) Event Contracts (CFTC Regulated)
    Oversight State gaming regulators Federal CFTC
    Settlement Based on game outcome Based on contract specifications
    Customer Access Sportsbooks, casinos, apps Futures trading platforms
    Legality Varies by state Uniform under federal regulation

    That table captures the crux of the fight. If the courts side with Robinhood, the company could bypass state gambling hurdles entirely. If not, its sports event contracts could be banned in large swathes of the country.

    A Clash of Regulatory Philosophies

    Nevada has long been considered the gold standard of sports betting regulation. New Jersey, meanwhile, was one of the first states to push aggressively into online sports wagering after the Supreme Court struck down a federal ban in 2018.

    Both argue they have a duty to protect consumers from predatory products. They worry that framing betting as trading could erode safeguards built over decades.

    Robinhood’s counter is straightforward: it already operates under strict federal oversight. Why should states interfere with a market the federal government has expressly allowed?

    It’s a clash not just of legal interpretations but also of regulatory philosophies. One sees betting as entertainment with consumer risks. The other sees financial contracts as investment products that should be open nationwide.

    Timing Raises Eyebrows

    Critics point out that Robinhood’s timing—launching new football contracts right before suing regulators—was a calculated gamble in itself. By moving quickly, the company caught state agencies off guard and built early momentum among customers before potential bans could take hold.

    For some, it’s a clever strategy. For others, it smacks of provocation.

    Still, Robinhood has been here before. From commission-free trading to cryptocurrency access, the company has often pushed boundaries first and dealt with regulators later. This latest clash continues that tradition.

    Wider Implications Beyond Two States

    Though the lawsuits focus on New Jersey and Nevada, the outcome could ripple across the U.S. If Robinhood wins, it sets a precedent that CFTC-regulated contracts can trump state gaming laws. That would effectively open the door for nationwide sports event contracts without state approval.

    If it loses, other states may follow with enforcement threats, potentially boxing Robinhood out of a lucrative market before it gains traction.

    Analysts see this as part of Robinhood’s broader effort to expand beyond stock trading, diversifying revenue streams in a competitive market. After years of being defined by meme stocks and volatile crypto runs, the company is now eyeing sports-linked products as its next big bet.

    Customers Left in the Middle

    For everyday users, the legal technicalities matter less than whether they can keep trading. Many of the 60,000 potentially affected customers may not even realise their contracts are now tied up in federal litigation.

    One Nevada-based trader told a local outlet he had only just signed up before hearing about the lawsuits. “I don’t care if they call it a contract or a bet,” he said. “I just don’t want to lose access mid-season.”

    That sentiment sums up the challenge. Customers want stability, regulators want control, and Robinhood wants growth. How the courts reconcile those interests could define the next chapter of prediction markets in America.

  • sportes Gaming Brasil Unveils LOTTU as Third Betting Brand With Own-Built Platform

    sportes Gaming Brasil Unveils LOTTU as Third Betting Brand With Own-Built Platform

    Esportes Gaming Brasil has launched its third and final betting brand, LOTTU, marking a fresh chapter in Brazil’s regulated gambling market with a platform built entirely in-house. The company says the move strengthens its grip on a rapidly maturing sector where competition and compliance now walk hand in hand.

    Brazil’s Betting Market Reaches a New Milestone

    The gambling industry in Brazil hasn’t stood still for a moment since regulation gained speed in recent years. With the Secretariat of Prizes and Bets (SPA) setting a clear cap of three brands per licence, companies are racing to fill their quotas. Esportes Gaming Brasil has now hit that ceiling.

    LOTTU joins its siblings Esportes da Sorte and Onabet, two names already established with Brazilian bettors. Each brand serves a slightly different audience, but LOTTU carries something extra—the backbone is a platform coded, tested, and refined internally.

    That choice matters. Operators often rely on third-party providers, which can limit flexibility. By building their own, Esportes Gaming Brasil can adapt quicker, integrate new tools faster, and keep costs in check. Some industry insiders argue that this could shift the competitive balance if others don’t follow suit.

    What LOTTU Brings to the Table

    LOTTU isn’t just another logo on a sportsbook site. Its launch has been designed with specific hooks for engagement. The company has highlighted three areas:

    • Interactive betting tools that let users customise their experience.

    • Real-time promotions triggered by live events.

    • Adaptive layouts that respond to the behaviours of different bettor groups.

    There’s also a spotlight on responsible gambling. The brand is embedding monitoring features to detect harmful play and offering direct links to support services. This is increasingly seen as essential in Brazil, especially as lawmakers watch closely how operators address addiction and consumer protection.

    One executive close to the project described LOTTU as “built for scale but grounded in responsibility,” suggesting that growth won’t come at the cost of oversight.

    Regulatory Pressure Shapes Strategy

    Brazil’s SPA has made it crystal clear: no more than three brands per licence. That regulation forces operators to be selective about launches. Esportes Gaming Brasil’s choice to invest in LOTTU signals where it thinks the growth potential lies.

    Some analysts believe that capping brands helps prevent market saturation. Others argue it stifles innovation by limiting the variety of products on offer. Either way, the rule is now shaping corporate strategies. For Esportes Gaming Brasil, the three-brand ceiling isn’t just a limit; it’s a line in the sand that demands efficiency.

    A market report from H2 Gambling Capital projected Brazil’s regulated sports betting market could exceed $6 billion in annual gross gaming revenue by 2027. With such stakes, getting the brand mix right is less about choice and more about survival.

    Competition Heats Up Across Brazil

    Esportes Gaming Brasil isn’t alone in the push. International giants like Flutter and Entain have already made strong moves in Latin America, viewing Brazil as a priority market. Local competitors are equally aggressive, leaning on celebrity endorsements, football club partnerships, and heavy advertising to attract bettors.

    LOTTU enters this space trying to differentiate through technology rather than just marketing muscle. Whether bettors will notice the difference is another question. Most users want speed, reliability, and clear odds—if LOTTU’s in-house platform delivers those, word of mouth could quickly work in its favour.

    But the competition is intense. As one industry analyst put it, “There’s no shortage of platforms in Brazil now. What matters is who can retain users beyond that first deposit.”

    Responsible Gambling Takes Centre Stage

    Gambling addiction is no longer brushed aside in corporate announcements. The Brazilian government has tied the growth of this sector to consumer safeguards. Esportes Gaming Brasil has followed suit, building behavioural tracking directly into LOTTU’s core system.

    The platform reportedly flags patterns like excessive deposits, late-night betting streaks, or chasing losses. Players then get nudges—reminders, cooldowns, or even temporary restrictions. And beyond the tech, the site will provide access to specialised counsellors.

    This focus isn’t just regulatory box-ticking. Public opinion is shifting. More Brazilians are comfortable with betting, but surveys from Datafolha show concern about addiction remains high. If LOTTU balances entertainment with protection, it may avoid some of the backlash that other operators face.

    Comparing Brazil’s Betting Operators

    A quick glance at how different operators position themselves shows the contrasts.

    Operator Brand Count Tech Model Responsible Gambling Focus Market Position
    Esportes Gaming Brasil 3 In-house & 3rd party mix Behaviour monitoring, support links Strong local presence
    Flutter Entertainment Multiple 3rd party heavy International compliance programs Global leader, Latin America push
    Entain Multiple Hybrid approach Partnerships with NGOs Expanding aggressively

    The table shows why Esportes Gaming Brasil’s strategy is noteworthy. Going fully in-house with one brand sets it apart in a crowded market.

    What Comes Next for LOTTU

    The question now is scale. Can LOTTU grow fast enough to justify the investment in its platform? If yes, Esportes Gaming Brasil could become a model for other regional operators. If not, it risks being overshadowed by competitors with deeper pockets and global reach.

    For now, the company is betting—quite literally—that Brazilians want something fresh. A system that feels intuitive, reacts to their habits, and still protects them. It’s a bold gamble, but then again, that’s the essence of this business.

  • Ohio Governor Pushes for Prop Bet Ban Amid MLB Probe Into Guardians Pitchers

    Ohio Governor Pushes for Prop Bet Ban Amid MLB Probe Into Guardians Pitchers

    Ohio’s top official is calling time on one of the most controversial aspects of legal sports betting — and he’s not mincing words.

    Governor Mike DeWine on Thursday made an urgent public appeal to the Ohio Casino Control Commission, demanding a statewide ban on all proposition bets, or “prop bets”, in light of recent integrity concerns. The tipping point? A swirling Major League Baseball investigation involving two Cleveland Guardians pitchers and suspect betting patterns during their games.

    A State on Edge After Betting Scandal Hits Home

    You don’t expect a scandal like this to land in your backyard — until it does.

    The MLB investigation has rocked fans and lawmakers alike. Guardians pitchers Luis Ortiz and Emmanuel Clase were both placed on paid administrative leave through the end of August. While neither has been charged with wrongdoing, their removal coincides with an ongoing probe into betting anomalies surrounding Cleveland’s June matchups. The bets under scrutiny? Proposition wagers.

    And those aren’t just bets on who wins or loses — they zero in on specifics. Like how many strikeouts a pitcher might get. Or whether a batter draws a walk. It’s that granularity that has officials worried.

    “This is no longer theoretical,” said DeWine. “We’re past the warning signs.”

    Why Prop Bets Stir So Much Controversy

    At first glance, prop bets sound harmless — even fun.

    But their impact has drawn scrutiny. Unlike traditional bets focused on game outcomes, prop bets are often tied to individual player actions. That means athletes can become prime targets for abuse, manipulation or — worse — threats.

    In Ohio, several college athletes previously reported receiving online harassment linked to their on-field performances. That trend, DeWine noted, was the first alarm bell.

    Now, with two professional players sidelined amid a formal MLB investigation, the situation has escalated.

    Prop bets also open a door, critics say, to micro-manipulation: a player could intentionally underperform in a specific statistical category without necessarily affecting the overall game result. That grey area has regulators nervous.

    A Call to Action With Political Teeth

    DeWine isn’t just issuing a warning. He’s leaning hard on the state’s regulatory bodies to act — and fast.

    The governor’s statement wasn’t vague. He specifically named the Ohio Casino Control Commission, pressing them to “immediately” consider removing prop bets from the list of legal wagers. While his office doesn’t have the authority to enact the ban outright, DeWine’s influence could weigh heavily on the Commission’s next moves.

    Here’s what’s on the table now:

    • Suspension or removal of player-specific prop bets in professional sports.

    • A potential extension of the ban to collegiate-level contests.

    • Further investigation into sportsbook operators who allow repeat patterns of suspicious betting.

    The Ohio Casino Control Commission hasn’t yet responded with a formal timeline, but insiders say emergency sessions are likely.

    How the Guardians Got Dragged Into the Spotlight

    Luis Ortiz and Emmanuel Clase — both prominent names on the Guardians’ pitching roster — found themselves at the centre of a situation that’s spiralling.

    Details remain scarce, but league sources point to “betting irregularities” detected during Cleveland games in June. Those anomalies were flagged in multiple states: New York, New Jersey, and Ohio. The common thread? Prop bets.

    Clase, a two-time All-Star, is one of the most recognisable figures in Cleveland’s bullpen. Ortiz, while less high-profile, had emerged as a key part of the team’s rotation. Their absence leaves a hole — not just in the lineup, but in fan trust.

    Major League Baseball confirmed both players will remain on leave pending the outcome of the investigation. No further disciplinary action has been taken — yet.

    National Pressure Builds on State Regulators

    Ohio’s not alone in wrestling with this issue.

    Since the federal ban on sports betting was lifted in 2018, more than 30 states have rolled out legal frameworks. And with that, prop betting has exploded. According to research from the American Gaming Association, proposition bets accounted for roughly 17% of all wagers during the 2023 NFL season.

    But critics argue those numbers come with consequences.

    Take New Jersey — which recently tweaked its rules to limit certain college-related prop bets. Or New York, where regulators have issued fines to sportsbooks over improper bet types.

    The table below shows the recent state-level actions on prop betting regulation:

    State Recent Action on Prop Bets Status
    Ohio Governor’s request to ban prop bets Under review
    New Jersey Restrictions on college athlete props Enforced
    New York Fines issued to sportsbooks over violations Ongoing
    Colorado No restrictions yet; review underway In discussion
    Pennsylvania Active monitoring and reporting requirements Enforced

    What This Means for Fans, Bettors and Athletes

    At street level, this feels personal.

    Cleveland fans, already weary from injuries and midseason inconsistency, now face another distraction. Bettors, especially those who rely on prop bets as part of daily wagers, could see big changes if the governor’s request gains traction.

    And athletes? Some say the pressure has never been more intense.

    Anonymously, one player told a local station: “It’s not just boos anymore. It’s DMs, threats, your family getting called out — all because someone bet the under on your strikeouts.”

    This isn’t just a policy debate. It’s a culture shift.

  • peru Tightens Grip on Online Gambling With New Regulatory Directorate

    peru Tightens Grip on Online Gambling With New Regulatory Directorate

    Peru is shaking up its gambling oversight. A fresh move by the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Tourism (Mincetur) could reshape the way online betting is authorised and tracked—marking a pivotal shift for an industry that’s grown fast but largely unchecked.

    This week, the government rolled out a new directorate dedicated entirely to the regulation of online gaming and remote sports betting. It’s all part of a broader attempt to modernise the ministry and keep pace with a sector that’s long outgrown the old playbook.

    A Structural Shake-Up Years in the Making

    For years, online betting and digital gaming in Peru were operating in a grey zone—lucrative, but loosely policed. Now, that era seems to be coming to a close.

    The new Directorate for the Authorization and Registration of Remote Gaming and Remote Sports Betting has been formally established under Supreme Decree No. 004-2025-MINCETUR. It replaces the decades-old organisational structure, dating back to 2002.

    The move is part of a much broader overhaul of the ministry’s Regulations on Organisation and Functions (ROF). Officials say the change isn’t just cosmetic. It’s about streamlining oversight and keeping up with today’s regulatory needs.

    One senior Mincetur source, who asked not to be named as they weren’t authorised to speak publicly, said the reorganisation had been discussed internally for nearly four years before finally getting the green light.

    Betting Boom Brings Scrutiny

    Gambling has been big business in Peru for a while. But it wasn’t until recent years—with the rise of mobile phones and digital wallets—that the remote betting market exploded.

    Now, there’s real money on the line—and plenty of it.

    • According to Mincetur estimates, Peru’s online gambling market could surpass $1 billion USD in annual turnover by the end of 2025.

    While these figures remain projections, they’ve drawn attention not just from operators and punters, but from legislators and tax officials keen to tighten controls.

    Previously, online operators existed in a kind of limbo. Some were registered overseas. Some were half-compliant. Many just flew under the radar.

    The new directorate aims to fix that. Operators will now have to apply for official authorisation and keep updated registration through the DGJCMT (General Directorate of Casino Games and Slot Machines).

    Who’s Really in Charge Now?

    The newly minted directorate falls under the wing of the DGJCMT, which is already responsible for brick-and-mortar casinos and slot machines. That office is headed by regulator Yuri Guerra Padilla, a well-known figure in Peru’s gaming circles.

    This gives the new directorate some institutional muscle. Guerra Padilla, appointed in 2021, has built a reputation for pushing through tough regulatory changes—sometimes in the face of stiff industry opposition.

    In recent comments to local press, Guerra Padilla hinted that several high-profile operators had already reached out to discuss compliance under the new law.

    The legal groundwork, meanwhile, had been laid last year through Law No. 31557, which officially regulates remote betting, and the New General Tourism Law (Law No. 32392), which covers the wider leisure and hospitality sector.

    What the Changes Mean for Operators

    Not everyone’s thrilled, of course. Industry insiders say the registration process could become a bottleneck, especially if Mincetur doesn’t roll out digital tools to speed things up.

    Still, the message is clear: those who don’t get authorised may find themselves locked out of Peru’s booming betting market.

    Here’s how the updated structure looks:

    Regulatory Element Old Framework (2002) New Framework (2025)
    Online Gaming Oversight Unregulated or informal Formal registration & authorisation process
    Legal Backing None specific Law No. 31557, Law No. 32392
    Supervisory Body No dedicated unit New directorate under DGJCMT
    Enforcement Power Weak or non-existent Enforced under Supreme Decree No. 004-2025

    The table above shows just how significant this reorganisation is.

    Aligning with Broader State Priorities

    Mincetur isn’t acting in isolation here. This revamp reflects a wider trend across the Peruvian government: trying to modernise agencies so they actually do what they’re meant to do.

    In a statement, Mincetur said the creation of the new directorate “strengthens institutional capacity to provide more efficient service to citizens.” That’s classic bureaucratic speak—but underneath it lies a real concern about staying relevant and functional.

    In fact, the ministry’s broader strategy aligns closely with State Organisation Guidelines adopted last year. These guidelines aim to reduce overlap between agencies and eliminate outdated bureaucratic frameworks.

    It’s also worth noting that the New General Tourism Law sees gambling and gaming as part of Peru’s broader “tourism experience,” adding pressure to ensure the sector is properly regulated.

    Not Just for Locals

    Foreign companies are watching closely. Several major international betting platforms currently operate in Peru via local partners or offshore licenses.

    They’ll need to rethink that strategy now.

    One Lima-based gaming lawyer told Bloomberg on background that “compliance will no longer be optional.” He added that several foreign firms are quietly assembling legal teams in anticipation of tougher audits.

    And for punters? The hope is that more oversight brings better protections. In theory, regulated platforms should offer clearer terms, fewer scams, and stronger data safeguards.

    That said, critics warn that too much red tape could push users back to unregulated or offshore sites, particularly if approval processes drag on.

  • Allwyn Goes All-In on Digital, Bows Out of Casinos in Germany and Australia

    Allwyn Goes All-In on Digital, Bows Out of Casinos in Germany and Australia

    Allwyn International has struck a decisive chord in its strategic playbook—locking in full control of Stoiximan while walking away from its casino interests in Germany and Australia. The move marks a firm pivot toward the digital future of gambling.

    The Czech-based lottery giant confirmed the €191.6 million buyout of the remaining stake in Stoiximan on July 18. Just weeks earlier, it had sealed exits from ten German casinos and was lining up a final farewell to its Australian gaming footprint. The shift isn’t subtle—it’s a loud signal that Allwyn sees online betting as the main stage.

    A Clean Break From Casino Floors

    The company’s departure from traditional land-based gaming didn’t happen overnight. In fact, it’s been quietly in the works for months.

    On July 1, Allwyn wrapped up the sale of its ten casinos in Lower Saxony, Germany. That transaction brought in a tidy €67.7 million. The payout included €15.2 million in dividends and €52.5 million from the actual sale.

    Then came the news from Down Under. Allwyn accepted an offer for its 42% interest in the Reef Hotel Casino in Cairns. The stake, held through the publicly listed Reef Casino Trust, will bring in roughly €54 million—assuming regulators and shareholders sign off.

    Combined, these deals are expected to pump around €105 million into Allwyn’s coffers.

    One sentence here, just to break it up.

    That money won’t be sitting still for long.

    Why Allwyn Is Betting Big on Stoiximan

    It’s clear where the fresh capital is headed. On July 18, OPAP—Allwyn’s Greek subsidiary—announced it would acquire the remaining 15.5% of Stoiximan for €191.6 million. The price reflects Stoiximan’s valuation on a debt-free, cash-free basis.

    OPAP already held a significant stake in the operator, so this deal is the final piece of the puzzle. Once it closes—expected sometime in Q3—Allwyn will have full control of one of the region’s most influential online sportsbooks.

    Just a single sentence here, to vary the rhythm.

    This isn’t some vanity acquisition. Stoiximan is a digital powerhouse in Greece and Cyprus. It’s been steadily gaining ground, and with Allwyn’s deep pockets and broader infrastructure, the future looks bullish.

    Here’s what makes the acquisition particularly significant:

    • Stoiximan brings established tech, talent, and a loyal customer base.

    • Online betting markets in Greece and Cyprus are still growing, not plateauing.

    • Full ownership allows Allwyn to integrate operations more tightly and drive efficiencies.

    It also fits the broader picture. Online betting—unlike traditional casinos—offers better margins, faster scalability, and less regulatory red tape in many jurisdictions.

    The Numbers Behind the Pivot

    Let’s break it down. The following table outlines the major financial moves in play:

    Transaction Country Value (EUR) Notes
    Casino Sale – Lower Saxony Germany €67.7M Includes €15.2M dividends + €52.5M from sale
    Stake Sale – Reef Hotel Casino Australia €54M Pending approval
    Stoiximan Final Stake Acquisition Greece/Cyprus €191.6M Gives Allwyn 100% control, via OPAP
    Total Asset Divestiture Proceeds €105M Redeployed into Stoiximan acquisition

    A one-sentence paragraph again—because why not?

    The outlay on Stoiximan dwarfs the returns from the casino sell-offs. But that’s the point. This isn’t about balance sheets; it’s about strategic focus.

    Why Now? Pressure and Opportunity

    Why would Allwyn exit stable casino assets in mature markets? The answer lies partly in pressure—and partly in vision.

    Regulations in both Germany and Australia have tightened in recent years. Margins are shrinking, compliance costs are rising, and innovation is harder to pull off inside physical venues. That’s especially true in Germany, where the fragmented federal gambling laws remain a headache.

    On the flip side, online sports betting is expanding across Europe and beyond. Post-pandemic habits have shifted, and digital-first operators are winning. Allwyn has seen enough. It’s going where the growth is.

    There’s also something else at play—consolidation. The global gambling market is seeing more M&A activity than ever. Owning 100% of Stoiximan doesn’t just mean better profit capture. It also means Allwyn can position itself for future combinations, partnerships, or spinouts.

    This might be about control—but it’s also about optionality.

    What This Means for the Industry

    For industry watchers, this move from Allwyn signals a wider trend.

    Land-based gaming operators are facing an identity crisis. Footfall is unpredictable. Overhead is high. Meanwhile, digital platforms can be nimble, lean, and far more responsive to shifting player behaviour.

    Allwyn isn’t alone in making a sharp digital turn. Entain, Flutter, and Kindred have all been reshaping their portfolios. Even traditional heavyweights like Caesars are pouring resources into online sportsbooks and iGaming arms.

    One line again to break the visual and reading pace.

    This is less a pivot and more a global shuffle.

    The Stoiximan deal also raises the competitive stakes in Southern Europe. Expect OPAP to double down on integrations, cross-promotions, and user experience. Local rivals may have to rethink their strategies—or risk falling behind.

  • Brazil Gives Green Light to Third Esportes Gaming Brand as LOTTUBET Enters Market

    Brazil Gives Green Light to Third Esportes Gaming Brand as LOTTUBET Enters Market

    Brazil’s sports betting sector is growing more crowded. On Thursday, the Ministry of Finance confirmed its approval for LOTTUBET to officially operate online gaming and sports wagering across the country. This green light marks the third active licence under the Esportes Gaming Brasil group, which already runs Esportes da Sorte and Onabet.

    The move, formalised by Ordinance No. 1,559, published by the Secretariat of Prizes and Betting (SPA), updates prior regulations and further opens up Brazil’s tightly controlled gambling space. It follows a legal process finalised under SEI No. 19995.000272/2025-49, signalling judicial support for this latest expansion.

    A third name joins the fold

    Three’s no longer a crowd — it’s a strategy. LOTTUBET, the newly authorised brand under the Esportes Gaming Brasil umbrella, now stands alongside Esportes da Sorte and Onabet. Each name is now cleared for action in Brazil’s regulated market, both online and in person.

    LOTTUBET’s addition follows a quiet but meaningful court decision earlier this year. That ruling paved the way for Thursday’s SPA update and appears to have provided the final legal hurdle for Esportes Gaming Brasil’s newest launch.

    The details of the legal ruling remain confidential. But its impact is now public.

    What’s really changing?

    Let’s not pretend this is just another logo on a screen. The arrival of LOTTUBET brings a few key shifts:

    • Esportes Gaming Brasil now operates three independent betting brands, a move that could allow for better market segmentation.

    • SPA’s decision suggests a more open stance toward expanding the operator base — a signal to other contenders waiting on approval.

    • Consumers may see greater variety in offerings, bonuses, odds, and branding across platforms.

    This development also reinforces the importance of judicial process in gaming approvals. Without the court nod earlier this year, LOTTUBET might still be on the sidelines.

    Bigger picture: Brazil’s expanding gaming playbook

    Brazil’s gaming market isn’t just warming up — it’s boiling over with new activity.

    Since the passage of Ordinance No. 136 back in January 2025, the Ministry of Finance has moved quickly to shape a framework that’s strict but functional. And within that, SPA has emerged as the key driver behind approvals and oversight.

    Here’s a quick timeline showing the group’s regulatory progress:

    Date Brand Approved Ordinance No. Status
    January 2025 Esportes da Sorte Ordinance No. 136 Fully operational
    January 2025 Onabet Ordinance No. 136 Fully operational
    July 2025 LOTTUBET Ordinance No. 1,559 Cleared for launch

    That SPA is granting third-brand rights to a single operator suggests a bit of confidence — not just in Esportes Gaming Brasil, but in the structure SPA has built around licensing.

    Competitive edge or market overload?

    Not everyone’s clapping. There’s a growing question inside Brazil’s betting sector about whether the market is becoming too dense too quickly. Some analysts warn that multiple brands under a single corporate group may lead to dilution, not competition.

    Yet others argue it’s smart business. Having three distinct faces — with their own marketing, platforms, and target audiences — gives Esportes Gaming Brasil more flexibility in a market still taking shape.

    “This is about audience segmentation,” one gaming consultant in São Paulo said Friday. “They’re not flooding the market, they’re covering it.”

    Still, there’s work to be done. LOTTUBET hasn’t launched publicly yet. The branding’s not fully rolled out. Its marketing approach, pricing, and platform features are all under wraps — for now.

    Legal clearance: the quiet key to growth

    Though the SPA’s ordinance makes the headline, it’s the SEI process that unlocked the gate.

    SEI No. 19995.000272/2025-49 — a process number buried in the official announcement — traces back to a judicial decision that made LOTTUBET’s approval possible. That case, while sealed from public view, likely dealt with regulatory interpretations tied to brand differentiation or ownership structure.

    One sentence in the ordinance confirms it: this expansion is the direct result of that legal proceeding.

    In short, the law got them there — not just luck or lobbying.

    What’s next for Esportes Gaming Brasil?

    No one inside Esportes Gaming Brasil has commented publicly on the news yet. But the addition of LOTTUBET points to a broader strategy.

    The group may be preparing to align each brand with different segments: one targeting high rollers, one casual users, and one niche markets like esports or regional bettors. That model has worked elsewhere, particularly in European markets.

    If that’s the play, Brazil could soon see more tailored promotions, more targeted bonuses, and perhaps even region-specific campaigns.

    At minimum, it’s a sign the group is playing a long game. With three licences in hand and a compliant track record so far, Esportes Gaming Brasil just put itself ahead of the pack — at least for now.

  • MelBet Eyes Kenya as Africa’s iGaming Star Begins to Shine

    MelBet Eyes Kenya as Africa’s iGaming Star Begins to Shine

    In a market where many feared to tread or exited quietly, MelBet Partners & Affiliates stayed the course. Now, as the Kenyan iGaming industry heats up, their early bet on East Africa’s digital gaming economy is starting to look like a masterstroke.

    What once seemed like a gamble in a fragmented continent is rapidly turning into one of the boldest plays in the online betting world. And Kenya? It’s right at the centre of the board.

    Betting on the right horse: Why Kenya?

    For years, the African iGaming market was overlooked—either underestimated or misunderstood. But in 2024, a noticeable shift began. And by mid-2025, Africa wasn’t just on the radar; it was front and centre for big brands with patience and a plan.

    MelBet’s affiliate wing stood firm while others folded.

    “We had a strategy. We understood Kenya’s framework better than most. That made all the difference,” said a MelBet spokesperson.

    Many global betting brands underestimated the legal red tape and cultural nuances. MelBet didn’t. They studied local betting patterns, paid attention to regional advertising restrictions, and hired locally to build trust.

    And let’s not ignore the big one—Kenya’s government has regulated betting for decades, making it one of the few African countries with structured gambling laws. A massive advantage.

    What sets Kenya apart in the continent’s gaming scene

    There’s no denying that Kenya has climbed to the top tier of Africa’s gaming scene. It’s not just about the numbers—it’s about stability, habit, and access.

    One thing’s clear: Kenya isn’t a copy-paste market.

    • Betting is ingrained in daily culture, especially among youth
    • Mobile money services like M-PESA make deposits and withdrawals easy
    • Urban internet penetration is among the best in East Africa
    • English is widely spoken, simplifying marketing for international brands

    Despite this, MelBet’s team insists that patience and cultural understanding have been key. “Kenyan users are smart. They want offers that make sense, platforms that are reliable, and brands that show up consistently—not just during football season,” said one affiliate manager based in Nairobi.

    A closer look at Kenya’s legal and economic advantage

    There’s something comforting about structure in an otherwise unpredictable region. Kenya offers that.

    The Betting, Lotteries and Gaming Act (BLGA) of 1966 laid the groundwork. It’s been updated several times since, but the foundation remains solid. Licensing is clear. Advertising rules are strict but navigable. And unlike some neighbouring countries, Kenya doesn’t leave operators in legal limbo.

    Here’s a quick side-by-side comparison to paint the picture:

    Country Gambling Status Tax Structure Payment Ecosystem
    Kenya Fully legal & regulated 15% GGR + 20% WHT M-PESA, Airtel Money
    Nigeria Partially regulated Varies by state Bank transfer-heavy
    South Africa Regulated (but limited) 9.6% – 15% GGR Card and EFT heavy
    Uganda Legal, unstable Unpredictable changes MTN Mobile Money

    That kind of regulatory transparency is rare in African markets. It’s no surprise, then, that affiliate partners feel safer launching campaigns in Kenya than anywhere else on the continent.

    Affiliates are learning from MelBet’s slow-and-steady model

    Kenya is fast becoming the blueprint for African affiliate marketing. But the playbook isn’t filled with flashy tricks—it’s built on consistency.

    One affiliate partner said they’d rather earn slow, predictable revenue than chase unsustainable highs in markets with looser laws. MelBet’s programme appeals to this mindset.

    They focus on real engagement, not short-term clicks. Payouts are reliable. And affiliates are encouraged to learn the nuances of each Kenyan region, not just blast generic ads.

    “Affiliates who fail in Kenya usually try to treat it like Europe,” one insider remarked bluntly.

    A growing youth population, a mobile-first economy—and no sign of slowing

    Here’s where things get even more interesting. Kenya’s population is young. Really young. Over 75% of its people are under 35. That means the iGaming industry isn’t peaking—it’s just warming up.

    And with most internet usage coming from mobile phones, platforms that are mobile-first (like MelBet) have an edge.

    This creates a unique scenario:

    1. Young users are digitally native

    2. They’re used to mobile money for everything from shopping to paying bills

    3. Live sports betting aligns with their real-time lifestyles

    Basically, if you’re not optimising for mobile in Kenya, you’re already behind. MelBet didn’t just optimise—they designed with mobile at the core.

    What’s next? Kenya as the launchpad, not the destination

    MelBet might be focusing on Kenya now, but there’s a bigger game afoot.

    Success in Kenya acts as a proof-of-concept. Investors, regulators, and partners are watching. If a brand can succeed in this regulated market with high user expectations, it proves scalability.

    There’s already chatter about expansion into Tanzania and Rwanda, where digital infrastructure is improving and betting interest is on the rise.

    Still, MelBet says Kenya will remain a key market. “We didn’t just build an audience. We built trust,” said a regional manager.

    And in Africa’s often volatile iGaming scene, trust isn’t just currency—it’s the whole bank.

  • FanDuel Pushes Back on Sky-High Sports Betting Taxes as Pressure Builds Across States

    FanDuel Pushes Back on Sky-High Sports Betting Taxes as Pressure Builds Across States

    FanDuel, one of the biggest names in U.S. sports betting, is sounding the alarm. They’re urging lawmakers across multiple states to pump the brakes on tax hikes before the industry buckles under the strain.

    The company’s message? If this keeps up, the regulated betting scene might not be around long enough to deliver the tax windfalls states are banking on.

    Taxing Trouble: Industry Cries Foul as Margins Collapse

    Cesar Fernandez, a top government affairs executive at FanDuel, made his case loud and clear this week at the National Council of Legislators from Gaming States (NCLGS) conference. He didn’t sugarcoat it.

    He warned that between the marketing budgets, tech costs, staffing, bonuses, and sky-high state taxes, sportsbooks are barely scraping by. Despite a 10% national hold rate — the slice of the betting pie operators actually keep — profits are thin. Painfully thin.

    According to FanDuel, sportsbooks only net $1.55 for every $100 wagered. That’s a 1.5% margin.

    For comparison, supermarket chains like Kroger or Tesco operate at around 2.5–3% margins — and they’re considered razor-thin too.

    “We’ve gone from being viewed as contributors to being seen as cash cows,” Fernandez said. “There’s this belief that gambling companies are swimming in profits — but the math just doesn’t hold up.”

    New York’s 51% Tax: “Brutal” and Bad for Business

    It’s not just FanDuel complaining. Across the industry, eyebrows are rising over New York’s towering 51% tax on gross gaming revenue. Operators call it unsustainable.

    Illinois isn’t far behind. The state recently slapped a $0.50 fee on every single bet — not on profits, but on the act of betting itself. That’s triggered a domino effect. Big players like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Fanatics Sportsbook are now passing that cost straight to users.

    One-sentence pause: It’s not just bad for business — it’s potentially pushing customers away.

    You can already see the cracks. Users grumble on Reddit and X (formerly Twitter) about worse odds, higher fees, and fewer bonuses. Operators are trimming promotions to stay afloat.

    What FanDuel Wants: Less Tax, More Casino

    FanDuel isn’t just shouting into the void — they’ve got a plan. Well, two, actually.

    First, they want state governments to reconsider these eye-watering tax rates. Second, they’re pushing for online casinos to be legalised in more states.

    Why? Because online casinos, unlike sports betting, don’t depend on unpredictable events like underdog wins or referee calls. The margins are healthier. The revenue is steadier. And the promotional costs are lower.

    Right now, only seven states have legalised online casino gambling. FanDuel and friends are lobbying hard to bring that number up.

    Here’s a snapshot of where online casinos stand today:

    State Online Casino Legal? Notes
    New Jersey ✅ Yes One of the most mature online markets
    Pennsylvania ✅ Yes Strong revenue, regulated environment
    Michigan ✅ Yes Rapid growth since 2021 launch
    West Virginia ✅ Yes Smaller population but legal market
    Connecticut ✅ Yes Partnered with tribes and big operators
    Delaware ✅ Yes Early adopter, limited competition
    Rhode Island ✅ Yes (recent) Live as of March 2024

    Fernandez points to these examples as proof that there’s room for healthy expansion — if lawmakers are willing to listen.

    The Real Risk: Users Fleeing to Illegal Operators

    In another panel, FanDuel’s attorney Brad Fischer issued a stark warning. He said the tax pressure isn’t just squeezing profits — it’s pushing people into the arms of unregulated operators.

    And this time, the threat isn’t theoretical.

    “It’s happening right now,” Fischer said. “And it’s only going to get worse.”

    The concern? Sweepstakes casinos and offshore betting sites — neither of which pay U.S. taxes or follow state rules — are thriving. Why? Because they offer better odds, more aggressive bonuses, and zero state surcharges.

    And while lawmakers may hope tax hikes will boost public coffers, the opposite could be happening.

    One sentence, just to let that sink in.

    Players drift away from regulated sportsbooks, and states lose both tax revenue and consumer protection oversight. It’s a lose-lose.

    Operators Say They’re Not Anti-Tax, Just Anti-Overkill

    Let’s be clear: FanDuel isn’t asking for a free ride. Industry insiders openly acknowledge they should contribute to state budgets — especially considering how fast the sector’s grown since 2018.

    But they argue there’s a tipping point. Go too far, and legal operators can’t compete.

    One executive summed it up privately like this:

    • “We’re not asking for sympathy — just sanity. You can’t tax something into extinction and expect it to keep paying you.”

    The math supports the mood. In New York, some analysts say the market has plateaued, and promotional spending has fallen off a cliff. Operators simply can’t afford to compete with aggressive bonuses anymore.

    And once the fun disappears for users, so do the dollars.

    Political Tensions Simmer Behind the Scenes

    States see gambling as a golden goose. But they’re starting to choke the bird.

    Lawmakers under budget pressure are leaning heavily on gambling revenue to patch holes in education, infrastructure, and healthcare funding. In election years, that pressure only intensifies.

    Behind the scenes, lobbying is in full swing. Trade groups are gearing up for fights in legislatures from Ohio to Maryland. FanDuel, DraftKings, and others are throwing money at the problem — but also facing growing scrutiny.

    Meanwhile, consumer advocates argue that if sportsbooks can’t survive without gouging users, maybe the model itself is broken.

    That kind of criticism hits a nerve.

    But one thing is certain: The future of legal sports betting in the U.S. is no longer a guaranteed win.

  • Detroit Casinos See $101 Million in June Revenue, Marking a Dip from May and 2024

    Detroit Casinos See $101 Million in June Revenue, Marking a Dip from May and 2024

    Detroit’s three commercial casinos generated a combined total of $101.04 million in revenue in June 2025, according to the Michigan Gaming Control Board. Although the figure remains significant, it shows a decline from May 2025 and the same period last year, signalling a potential slowdown for the city’s gambling industry.

    Slot and Table Games Revenue Dips

    The lion’s share of Detroit’s casino revenue comes from slot machines and table games, which contributed $100.38 million in June 2025. However, this marks a 4.0% drop in revenue compared to June 2024. Additionally, the figure represents an 11% decline from the previous month, May 2025.

    Despite this drop, the performance for the first half of 2025 was somewhat stable. Table and slot game revenues for January through June 2025 were just 0.8% lower than in the first half of 2024. While the year-on-year figures aren’t too alarming, the sharp month-to-month decline in June has raised questions about the future trajectory of the market.

    It’s not just the slot and table games that are underperforming. Detroit’s casinos also experienced weakness in their sports betting operations.

    Sports Betting Shows Weakness

    Retail sports betting, a growing segment for the casinos, posted disappointing figures in June. The state’s combined sports betting handle amounted to $7.2 million, with casinos taking in $665,435 in Qualified Adjusted Gross Receipts (QAGR). The revenue from this segment dropped significantly, showing a 25.1% decline from June 2024 and a staggering 48.1% dip compared to May 2025.

    As sports betting continues to grow across the United States, these numbers raise eyebrows. Could this indicate a slowdown in consumer interest, or is it a temporary blip in a typically volatile market?

    MGM Grand Detroit Leads the Pack

    Among Detroit’s three commercial casinos, MGM Grand Detroit continues to be the leader in revenue. The casino reported earnings of $48.43 million in June, capturing 48% of the market share. This is slightly down from the same month last year, which saw a 0.6% decline in revenue.

    Despite the market slowdown, MGM’s market dominance appears strong. However, as the casino market in Detroit faces headwinds, the question remains: Will MGM’s lead hold in the face of ongoing challenges from competition and shifts in customer behaviour?

    The Big Picture for Detroit’s Casino Market

    While Detroit’s commercial casinos are still generating significant revenue, June’s results indicate a slowdown that could have lasting effects on the city’s gambling industry. The month-on-month decline, combined with the drop in retail sports betting, points to potential challenges ahead.

    The next few months will be critical for casino operators as they work to adapt to changing consumer habits, economic uncertainty, and increased competition. Will Detroit’s casinos bounce back, or will this marked decline signal a shift in the city’s gambling landscape?

  • FanDuel Keeps its Stronghold in U.S. Sports Betting, But Smaller Rivals Are Catching Up

    FanDuel Keeps its Stronghold in U.S. Sports Betting, But Smaller Rivals Are Catching Up

    FanDuel has once again maintained its position as the leader in the U.S. sports betting and iGaming market, marking its sixth consecutive month atop the rankings. This dominance is evident across various metrics, but smaller competitors are gradually gaining ground, according to a new report from investment firm Jefferies.

    FanDuel, which is a part of Flutter Entertainment, continues to lead the pack, outperforming its competitors in key areas like search interest, web traffic, and engagement. Data from Google Trends, ListenFirst, and Sensor Tower highlight how the company has built and sustained its significant presence in the industry. However, the competition is intensifying, with companies like DraftKings and BetMGM consistently narrowing the gap.

    FanDuel’s Continued Dominance

    FanDuel has maintained its grip on the U.S. market thanks to several key factors. With a user-friendly platform and consistent innovation, the brand has managed to secure a loyal customer base. According to Jefferies’ report, the sports betting giant has been the most-searched and engaged sportsbook across all major digital metrics, including web traffic, app downloads, and social media interactions.

    • Google Trends Data: FanDuel outpaces its competitors in terms of search interest, reflecting strong consumer curiosity and loyalty.

    • Web Traffic and App Downloads: Data from Sensor Tower confirms FanDuel’s lead in app downloads, signaling the continued popularity of its platform.

    • Social Media Engagement: FanDuel has garnered more social media attention than its competitors, further solidifying its position in the market.

    Even though the company has managed to stay ahead in terms of these digital indicators, other sportsbooks are making their presence felt.

    The Rising Threat of Smaller Rivals

    While FanDuel’s dominance is hard to ignore, smaller competitors like DraftKings and BetMGM are steadily gaining ground. DraftKings, which ranks second on the list, has continued to expand its customer base by offering diverse betting options and promotions. Meanwhile, BetMGM, which secured the third spot, has benefitted from strong partnerships, including its prominent role in the casino industry.

    Other smaller players are also seeing improvements in their rankings, suggesting that FanDuel may not have an easy road ahead. Companies such as bet365, Penn Entertainment’s ESPN Bet, and Rush Street Interactive’s BetRivers have been increasing their market share through strategic marketing campaigns and competitive offers.

    DraftKings, in particular, has been able to drive traffic with aggressive advertising campaigns. Its constant focus on innovation has made it a formidable competitor. Though it lags behind FanDuel in some digital metrics, the gap is narrowing, and many industry insiders are keeping a close eye on its potential for growth.

    A Diverse Top Ten Landscape

    The U.S. sports betting market remains highly competitive, with FanDuel at the top, but other sportsbooks making significant strides. According to Jefferies’ report, the top ten sportsbooks in the market include well-known names like DraftKings, BetMGM, and Caesars Sportsbook & Casino, as well as emerging players like Fanatics Sportsbook and Hard Rock Casino.

    The full list of the top ten sportsbooks, based on digital momentum, includes:

    • FanDuel (1st)

    • DraftKings (2nd)

    • BetMGM (3rd)

    • bet365 (4th)

    • ESPN Bet (5th)

    • BetRivers (6th)

    • Bally’s (7th)

    • Hard Rock Casino (8th)

    • Fanatics Sportsbook (9th)

    • Caesars Sportsbook & Casino (10th)

    Despite FanDuel’s lead, these competitors are slowly eating into the market share. Whether through digital engagement or better promotional strategies, many of these sportsbooks are working hard to catch up with the leader. For consumers, this creates more choices and competitive offers, further heating up the battle for supremacy.

    The Digital Metrics That Matter

    The Jefferies report doesn’t just focus on traditional market share but on important digital metrics, providing a glimpse of where the industry is heading. Metrics such as app downloads, social media interactions, and search interest provide valuable insights into the success of a sportsbook.

    For example, when comparing web traffic, FanDuel significantly outperforms its closest competitors. The same trend is visible with app downloads. However, it’s crucial to note that BetMGM and DraftKings have been closing the gap, particularly in key regions where advertising dollars have been directed.

    These metrics aren’t just numbers—they show how effectively sportsbooks are engaging with potential customers. It’s not just about offering a product; it’s about staying relevant, keeping consumers interested, and driving them to open the app or website.