Blog

New Jersey lawmakers are taking decisive action to address what they see as a growing problem in the state: sweepstakes gambling. The state’s legislators have introduced a bill that aims to shut down these promotional, prize-based games, arguing that they too closely resemble traditional gambling and currently operate in a murky legal and regulatory space.

Unveiling the Bill

On Monday, State Senator John Burzichelli (D-Salem, Gloucester, Cumberland) and Assemblyman Clinton Calabrese (D-Bergen, Passaic) unveiled the proposed legislation, signaling a shift in the state’s stance on these gambling-like operations. The two lawmakers pointed to growing concerns raised by New Jersey’s gaming regulators, who warned that these promotional sweepstakes are increasingly taking advantage of gaps in the current laws.

“Our regulators came to the Legislature and said, ‘These guys found a sweet spot, and they’re operating in a gray area,’” Senator Burzichelli said. “We don’t have the reach we should have to protect consumers.”

The bill proposes stricter oversight of these sweepstakes platforms, which often allow players to participate in traditional casino games such as slots, roulette, blackjack, and poker. But here’s the catch: the way these platforms operate is a bit of a loophole. They employ a dual-currency system, where participants use credits or tokens that don’t have a direct monetary value. In many ways, these platforms look and feel like casinos—yet technically, they aren’t classified as such.

What is Sweepstakes Gambling?

At its core, sweepstakes gambling is a marketing or promotional event that offers prizes or cash equivalents to participants. But unlike typical gambling operations, which rely on real money to place wagers, sweepstakes platforms often use a two-tiered system. Players purchase “credits” or “tokens,” which allow them to play games, but these credits can’t be directly exchanged for cash. This model creates a complex legal situation, where it isn’t clear whether these games should be regulated like other forms of gambling.

Critics argue that this lack of clarity allows these platforms to operate in a legal grey zone, where they can resemble traditional casinos but without the same level of oversight. The concern is that this could lead to consumers being unfairly exposed to gambling risks, without the necessary protections that are typically afforded to players in regulated environments.

A Growing Concern

The increasing popularity of sweepstakes gambling has raised alarms across the state. While the platforms may be framed as harmless promotional games, gaming regulators and consumer protection advocates are concerned about their potential impact on the public. The dual-currency system has made it difficult for the state to ensure that these platforms adhere to the same standards as traditional casinos, which are heavily regulated to prevent fraud, addiction, and other social harms.

There’s also the question of fairness. Since these platforms often involve traditional gambling games, like poker and blackjack, players may mistakenly assume they’re operating within the same regulatory framework as land-based or online casinos. But, as the legislators behind the bill point out, that assumption is far from accurate. Without clear regulation, players may face unregulated financial risks that can lead to significant losses.

What’s Next for the Legislation?

As lawmakers push for a ban on sweepstakes gambling, it remains to be seen how the bill will fare in the state legislature. Supporters of the bill argue that the legislation is a necessary step to close the loophole and bring these promotional games into compliance with existing gambling laws. They also hope that the move will help protect consumers from potentially harmful gambling-like behavior.

On the other hand, some opponents of the bill argue that these platforms should be allowed to exist under a regulated framework, rather than a complete ban. They argue that with the right regulations, these platforms could operate safely while still offering the entertainment value that many consumers enjoy.

In the coming months, it will be crucial to watch how this debate unfolds, as it could have significant implications for the future of sweepstakes gambling not just in New Jersey, but across the country. Will lawmakers take action to close the regulatory gaps? Or will this legislation spark a broader conversation about how sweepstakes games should be classified and regulated.

The Buffet at Luxor, known for its affordable all-you-can-eat offerings, will close permanently on March 30. MGM Resorts is reshaping its dining strategy as market trends and consumer demand evolve.

The iconic Buffet at Luxor has been a staple for budget-conscious visitors to Las Vegas, offering a wide variety of foods at a fixed price. However, in a move that reflects a larger trend in the city’s dining scene, MGM Resorts International has confirmed that it will close the restaurant at the end of March. With the final day of service scheduled for March 30, patrons looking to indulge in the buffet’s offerings will have just a few more weeks to enjoy the experience.

While MGM has not disclosed specific plans for the space that The Buffet currently occupies, company representatives have explained that the decision is part of an ongoing strategy to adapt to changing consumer preferences. In a brief statement, a spokesperson emphasized that MGM continuously evaluates its properties to ensure they remain aligned with market trends and the evolving demands of visitors.

This closure follows a broader pattern in Las Vegas, where buffets have seen a significant decline in popularity, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic. During the height of the pandemic, many buffets across the Strip were forced to shut down, citing health concerns and safety protocols. Even as restrictions have eased, buffets have struggled to regain their former status. For many casino operators, the all-you-can-eat model has been increasingly seen as a loss leader, often costing more to run than it generates in revenue.

Changing Dining Landscape on the Las Vegas Strip

The shift away from buffet dining is not unique to the Luxor. Over the last few years, numerous Strip casinos have opted to close or redesign their buffet experiences. While some have embraced new, more modern dining concepts—focusing on high-end restaurants, celebrity chef collaborations, and diverse cuisine options—the traditional buffet model has faced an uphill battle.

It’s a sign of the times, with changing consumer behavior leading to less demand for the once-popular dining option. Buffets, which were originally designed as a way to attract large crowds and offer variety, have struggled to keep pace with a younger generation of tourists who often prefer quick-service options or premium, unique dining experiences.

Still, Las Vegas isn’t entirely turning its back on the buffet concept. There are currently eight remaining all-you-can-eat buffets on the Strip, with half of them operated by MGM Resorts. While this represents a significant decline from years past, it indicates that there is still a niche market for buffet dining, particularly among tourists seeking an affordable meal in the city known for its extravagant offerings.

In addition to the Strip, there are a number of off-Strip casinos that continue to offer buffet-style dining. Notable examples include South Point, Rio, and Palms, which maintain their all-you-can-eat options and have cultivated loyal followings from both locals and visitors.

The Post-Pandemic Buffet Decline

The COVID-19 pandemic undoubtedly played a major role in the shift away from buffets in Las Vegas. With health protocols dictating that self-service food stations were no longer viable, many casinos opted to shut down buffets entirely. This not only impacted guest experience but also led to significant operational challenges for buffet operators, who often struggled to adapt to the new standards.

As a result, some buffets were either permanently closed or rebranded into new dining formats. These changes are indicative of the industry’s broader focus on safety, guest preferences, and profitability. The pandemic acted as a catalyst, accelerating trends that were already beginning to reshape the dining landscape.

Although many buffets have since reopened, they are often a shadow of their former selves, operating with smaller menus, fewer staff, and often at a higher cost to customers. While some guests still appreciate the value that buffets offer, many have shifted to other dining options that provide a more personalized experience.

Economic Realities and Market Shifts

For casino operators like MGM Resorts, buffets are often considered a “loss leader.” This term refers to services or products offered at a loss to attract customers, who may then spend more money on other casino offerings, such as gaming or drinks. However, as the cost of operating buffets has increased—due to food and labor expenses—the margins have become too thin for many properties to justify keeping them open.

At the same time, the dining preferences of Las Vegas visitors are changing. Tourists today are looking for experiences that go beyond simply filling their stomachs. They want high-quality food, celebrity chefs, immersive dining experiences, and more unique options. In response, casinos are shifting their focus toward premium restaurants, craft cocktails, and curated dining experiences that cater to a more sophisticated audience.

This shift is not just limited to the Strip. Off-Strip properties, which tend to attract a more local crowd, are also rethinking their food offerings. Buffets may be a fixture at casinos like South Point and Rio, but even they are beginning to evolve, offering a wider variety of dining experiences to appeal to the changing tastes of their guests.