Iowa lawmakers are moving to block cities from incorporating state-licensed gaming projects into urban renewal plans. New bills introduced in both chambers of the legislature on Wednesday aim to prevent casino developments from benefiting from local tax incentives—although the impact on existing projects remains uncertain.
Proposed Legislation Targets Future Casino Projects
The proposed legislation would prohibit cities from including casinos in urban renewal plans if their licenses are issued on or after January 1, 2025. This measure comes just weeks after the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission approved a license for Cedar Crossing Casino, a $275 million project planned in Cedar Rapids.
City officials confirmed that the casino site falls within an urban renewal district, a designation typically used for economic development, affordable housing, and revitalizing blighted areas. However, developers of the Cedar Rapids casino have stated they are not seeking tax incentives, potentially shielding the project from any direct impact if the bill becomes law.
State Sen. Scott Webster (R-Bettendorf) emphasized that the legislation would not apply retroactively, meaning the Cedar Crossing Casino likely won’t be affected. “If they’re not asking for TIF (tax increment financing) incentives, this wouldn’t change anything for them,” Webster told The Gazette.
Cedar Rapids Casino Sparks Tension in Legislature
The push for this new restriction comes on the heels of a previous effort to freeze casino expansion in Iowa. Lawmakers previously attempted to impose a five-year moratorium on new casino licenses, a measure that cleared the House but ultimately failed in the Senate.
Webster, who managed that moratorium bill, represents a district that includes two competing casinos: Rhythm City Casino Resort in Davenport and Isle Casino Hotel Bettendorf. Market studies have suggested that a new casino in Cedar Rapids could siphon revenue from these establishments, a concern for legislators representing those regions.
The timing of this new proposal raises questions. Cedar Rapids Mayor Tiffany O’Donnell expressed frustration, stating that recent legislative efforts appear specifically aimed at derailing the Cedar Crossing Casino project.
“In light of a series of bills that appear to target Cedar Crossing, we will do as we have from the beginning: Follow the process, adhere to the law, and act in the best interest of the thousands of Linn County voters who twice approved gaming in our community,” O’Donnell said in a statement.
What’s at Stake for Cities and Casinos?
Urban renewal areas in Iowa allow local governments to direct resources toward economic revitalization. These areas often rely on tax increment financing (TIF), which enables cities to reinvest tax revenues from new developments into infrastructure and public services.
While casinos can be lucrative for local economies, lawmakers backing the bill argue that gambling projects should not be eligible for urban renewal incentives, even if they contribute to job creation and tax revenue.
A few key points stand out:
- Casinos that receive licenses before 2025 would not be affected by the proposed law.
- Cities could still designate urban renewal areas, but gaming projects wouldn’t qualify for certain financial incentives.
- Cedar Rapids’ casino, though located in an urban renewal district, has not applied for TIF funding, potentially rendering this bill irrelevant to its development.
Next Steps for the Legislation
Senate Study Bill 1159 and House Study Bill 208 are now set to move through the legislative process, with a public hearing scheduled for 11 a.m. Thursday at the Iowa Capitol.
Whether the bills gain traction remains to be seen. Previous attempts to curb casino expansion in Iowa have faced resistance, particularly from communities that rely on gaming revenue to fund public projects. However, with some lawmakers pushing to limit casino growth, the debate over gambling’s role in economic development is far from over.